- Clinical Findings & Diagnostic Criteria
- Risk Factors
- Etiology
- Pathology
- Epidemiology
- Management & Treatment
- Prevention
- Complications
- Prognosis
- Research Frontier
- Clinical Case Studies
- Study Questions
Symptoms
Proximal muscle weakness
Signs
Laboratory Tests
, increased muscle enzyme levels
EMG, electromyographic changes and
Content 12
Drug-induced myopathies can be classified according to the presence or absence of muscular pain and associated neuropathy.1
Some drug-induced myopathies are associated with neuropathy.
Among painless myopathies, we can distinguish myopathies without neuropathy (corticosteroids), myopathies with neuropathy (colchicine, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine) and myasthenic syndromes (D-penicillamine, antibiotics, beta-blockers).
Among painful myopathies, the classification is similar: painful myopathies may or may not be associated with neuropathies. Painful myopathies include polymyositis (D-penicillamine, cimetidine, zidovudine) and other myopathies without polymyositis (clofibrate, statines, cyclosporin). Among the painful neuromyopathies, eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome is a recently described disorder associated with the use of L-tryptophan. Combinations of drugs (for example, a fibrate and a statine or cyclosporin and colchicine) can induce severe myopathies. If such drugs are used together a vigorous surveillance to detect any sign of myopathy is warranted. Instead of classifying drug-induced myopathies according to clinical features, a histological classification can be proposed. Many drugs can induce vacuolar myopathy (colchicine, chloroquine, amiodarone, cyclosporin, drugs causing hypokalaemia and lipid-lowering agents), some others cause a mitochondrial myopathy (zidovudine) or a necrotizing myopathy as seen with vincristine. Overall, several criteria for reporting drug-induced myopathy can be recommended: lack of pre-existent muscular symptoms, a free period between the beginning of the treatment and the appearance of symptoms, lack of another cause accounting for the myopathy, and complete or incomplete resolution after withdrawal of the treatment. Rechallenge of the treatment is not advisable because of the risk of a serious relapse. The exact mechanisms by which drugs cause myopathies are unknown. Some cases may be due to metabolic changes, whereas others may be immune mediated. Nevertheless, the aspect these conditions have in common is the regression of the myopathy with the discontinuation of the drug.
histological lesions
Content 9
Complications of Injecting Drug Use
- Local problems—Abscess (Figures 240-2
and 240-3; Abscess), cellulitis, septic thrombophlebitis, local induration, necrotizing fasciitis, gas gangrene, pyomyositis, mycotic aneurysm, compartmental syndromes, and foreign bodies (e.g., broken needle parts) in local areas.2A 32-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes developed large abscesses all over her body secondary to injection of cocaine and heroin. Her back shows the large scars remaining after the healing of these abscesses. (Courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD.)
- IDUs are at higher risk of getting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) skin infections that the patient may think are spider bites (Figure 240-4).
- Some IDUs give up trying to inject into their veins and put the cocaine directly into the skin. This causes local skin necrosis that produces round atrophic scars (Figure 240-5).
- IDUs are at risk for contracting systemic infections, including HIV and hepatitis B or hepatitis C.
- Injecting drug users are at risk of endocarditis, osteomyelitis (Figures 240-6and 240-7), and an abscess of the epidural region. These infections can lead to long hospitalizations for intravenous antibiotics. The endocarditis that occurs in IDUs involves the right-sided heart valves (see Chapter 50, Bacterial Endocarditis).2 They are also at risk of septic emboli to the lungs, group A β-hemolytic streptococcal septicemia, septic arthritis, and candidal and other fungal infections.
Content 3
Content 13
Content 11
Content 1
A 75-year-old triathlete complains of gradually worsening vision over the past year. It seems to be involving near and far vision. The patient has never required corrective lenses and has no significant medical history other than diet-controlled hypertension. He takes no regular medications. Physical examination is normal except for bilateral visual acuity of 20/100. There are no focal visual field defects and no redness of the eyes or eyelids. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
The correct answer is A. You answered A.
Age-related macular degeneration is a major cause of painless, gradual bilateral central visual loss. It occurs as nonexudative (dry) or exudative (wet) forms. Recent genetic data have shown an association with the alternative complement pathway gene for complement factor H. The mechanism link for that association is unknown. The nonexudative form is associated with retinal drusen that leads to retinal atrophy. Treatment with vitamin C, vitamin E, beta-carotene, and zinc may retard the visual loss. Exudative macular degeneration, which is less common, is caused by neovascular proliferation and leakage of choroidal blood vessels. Acute visual loss may occur because of bleeding. Exudative macular degeneration may be treated with intraocular injection of a vascular endothelial growth factor antagonist (bevacizumab or ranibizumab). Blepharitis is inflammation of the eyelids usually related to acne rosacea, seborrheic dermatitis, or staphylococcal infection. Diabetic retinopathy, now a leading cause of blindness in the United States, causes gradual bilateral visual loss in patients with long-standing diabetes. Retinal detachment is usually unilateral and causes visual loss and an afferent pupillary defect.
Content 3
Question 1 of 1
A 42-year-old African-American man has been diagnosed with hypertension for the past 10 years and treated with medication. One morning, he is found unresponsive by his wife. He is taken to the emergency department and pronounced dead by the physician. An autopsy revealed cardiac hypertrophy and a narrowing of the aorta just distal to the ligamentum arteriosum, with dilation of the intercostal artery's ostia. How could the death have possibly been prevented?